Author Guidelines

Dynamic Computing welcomes original, high-quality research contributions in areas covered by the journal's aims and scope. Authors are encouraged to carefully follow the guidelines below before submitting a manuscript.

1. Originality and Exclusivity

Manuscripts submitted to Dynamic Computing must be original works that have not been previously published and are not simultaneously under consideration by another journal or publication venue.

Authors must not submit the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously.

2. Types of Articles

The journal accepts the following types of scholarly contributions:

Research Articles – Original research presenting significant theoretical, methodological, experimental, computational, or practical contributions.
Review Articles – Comprehensive and critical reviews of significant developments in a particular research area.
Short Communications – Concise reports presenting important preliminary findings, novel observations, technical developments, or focused research contributions.

3. Manuscript Preparation

Authors should prepare manuscripts using a clear and consistent academic structure. Depending on the nature of the research, a manuscript may generally include:

Title
Author names and affiliations
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Related Work or Literature Review
Materials and Methods / Methodology
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Data Availability Statement, where applicable
Funding Statement, where applicable
Conflict of Interest Statement
Acknowledgements, where applicable
References

The exact structure may vary depending on the article type and subject area.

4. Title

The title should be concise, informative, and accurately reflect the content of the manuscript. Authors should avoid unnecessary abbreviations and overly broad statements in the title.

5. Abstract

The abstract should provide a concise summary of the research and should clearly communicate the purpose, methodology, major findings, and principal conclusions of the study.

Authors should ensure that the abstract is understandable without requiring the reader to refer to the main manuscript.

6. Keywords

Authors should provide appropriate keywords that accurately represent the major concepts and subject areas addressed in the manuscript. Keywords should be specific and relevant to the research and should assist readers in discovering the article through scholarly databases.

7. Figures and Tables

All figures and tables should be clearly numbered and appropriately referenced within the manuscript.

Figures should have clear captions.
Tables should have descriptive titles or captions.
Figures and tables should be relevant to the discussion.
Authors should ensure that all figures and tables are of suitable quality for publication.
Any third-party material must be used with appropriate permission and acknowledgement where required.

8. Equations and Mathematical Content

Mathematical equations should be clearly formatted and consistently numbered where necessary. Symbols, variables, and abbreviations should be defined when first introduced.

9. References and Citation

Authors must ensure that all sources cited in the manuscript are included in the reference list and that all references are accurate and complete.

Authors should use a consistent scholarly citation and reference format throughout the manuscript. References should be relevant to the research and should accurately represent the existing literature.

Where available, authors are encouraged to include persistent identifiers such as DOI information for cited works.

10. Ethical Requirements

Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research complies with applicable ethical, legal, institutional, and professional requirements.

Where applicable, manuscripts should include information regarding ethical approval, informed consent, data protection, or other relevant ethical considerations.

11. Plagiarism and Originality

All submissions must represent original scholarly work. Plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabrication, falsification, and other forms of research or publication misconduct are not acceptable.

Submitted manuscripts may be subject to plagiarism or similarity screening as part of the editorial process.

12. Authorship

All individuals listed as authors should have made a meaningful contribution to the research and manuscript and should be able to take responsibility for their contribution.

All authors should approve the final version of the manuscript before submission.

Changes to authorship after submission should only be requested for legitimate reasons and may require approval from all affected authors and the Editorial Office.

13. Conflict of Interest

Authors must disclose any financial, professional, personal, institutional, or other relationships that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the research or its interpretation.

If no conflict exists, authors should provide an appropriate statement such as:

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this work.

14. Funding Statement

Authors should disclose the sources of financial or institutional support that contributed to the research. If the research received no specific funding, an appropriate statement should be provided.

15. Data Availability

Authors should provide a Data Availability Statement where applicable. The statement should indicate whether the data supporting the findings are publicly available and, where appropriate, provide information regarding the relevant repository or access conditions.

Where data cannot be publicly shared because of ethical, legal, privacy, or confidentiality restrictions, the authors should clearly explain the applicable restrictions.

16. Use of Artificial Intelligence

Authors may use Artificial Intelligence or Generative AI tools in accordance with the journal's AI & Generative AI Policy.

Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and authenticity of the submitted manuscript. AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors.

Significant use of AI in manuscript preparation should be appropriately disclosed.

17. Language and Presentation

Manuscripts should be written in clear, professional academic English. Authors should carefully check grammar, spelling, terminology, figures, tables, equations, and references before submission.

18. Supplementary Materials

Authors may submit supplementary materials where they provide additional information that supports the published research. Such materials may include datasets, code, additional figures, tables, experimental details, or other relevant research materials.

19. Submission Process

Manuscripts should be submitted electronically through the journal's online submission system.

Authors are required to:

Register for an account or log in to the journal's submission system.
Start a new submission.
Select the appropriate article section.
Complete the required submission information.
Upload the manuscript and any required supplementary files.
Enter the requested metadata, including title, abstract, keywords, authors, affiliations, and references where applicable.
Complete the submission checklist and required declarations.
Review the submission information carefully.
Submit the manuscript for editorial consideration.

20. Submission Checklist

Before completing a submission, authors should ensure that:

The manuscript is original and is not under consideration elsewhere.
All authors have approved the submitted manuscript.
The manuscript follows the journal's formatting requirements.
The abstract and keywords have been provided where required.
All figures and tables are properly cited and presented.
References are complete and consistently formatted.
Required ethical declarations have been provided.
Funding information has been disclosed where applicable.
Conflicts of interest have been disclosed.
The Data Availability Statement has been provided where applicable.
AI use has been disclosed where applicable.

21. Peer Review

Submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial assessment followed, where appropriate, by peer review. The journal uses a Double-Blind Peer Review process, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other during the review process.

Editorial decisions are based on the quality, originality, relevance, technical soundness, and overall contribution of the manuscript.

22. Revision of Manuscripts

If revisions are requested, authors should carefully address the comments provided by the editors and reviewers. A revised manuscript should clearly indicate the changes made and should be accompanied by a response explaining how the reviewer comments have been addressed.

23. Publication Decision

The final decision regarding publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief or designated editor based on the outcome of the editorial assessment and peer-review process.

Possible decisions may include acceptance, minor revision, major revision, resubmission for further review, or rejection.

24. Post-Publication Responsibilities

Authors should promptly inform the Editorial Office if they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article. The journal will assess the matter in accordance with its Retraction & Correction Policy.

25. Contact

Authors who require clarification regarding manuscript preparation or the submission process may contact the Editorial Office through the contact information provided on the journal website.